|Item Type||ISO/PM rating||Filter Class EN779||Filter Class EN1822||Filter Class ASHRAE||Width (mm)||Height (mm)||Depth (mm)||Airflow (m3/h)||Pressure drop Initial (Pa)|
|4V300||ePM1 75%||F7||MERV 13||592||592||292||4250||135|
|4V300XL||ePM1 75%||F7||MERV 13||592||592||292||4250||125|
|4V300||ePM1 80%||F8||MERV 14||592||592||292||4250||145|
|4V300XL||ePM1 80%||F8||MERV 14||592||592||292||4250||135|
|4V300||ePM1 85%||F9||MERV 15||592||592||292||4250||170|
|4V300XL||ePM1 85%||F9||MERV 15||592||592||292||4250||160|
Case Study: The units are exposed to harsh environmental conditions that lead to spikes in pressure drop (dP) and excessive engine degradation from fouling and corrosion. As a result, the customer was forced to schedule unwanted shutdowns for maintenance.Case Studies
Case Study: Camfil Wins Dalkia Over Four Competitors. Dalkia designed 12 testing benches to compare four air filtration combinations on three sites in France with different operating environments. Four competitors were free to select their best combinations.
Case Study: Retrofit Solutions For Tata Power Ltd. Based on the site survey, Camfil proposed replacement of the pulse filter system with a three-stage static/barrier filter system, considering the local environment filled with refineries and a thermal power plant nearby.