CityCarb I

  • Compact “2 in 1” filtration solution; particulate and molecular
  • Ideal for filtering low concentrations of most external and internal source pollutants
  • 100% incinerable
  • Can be used to upgrade existing installations
  • Range of standard sizes
  • Rapid Adsorption Dynamics (RAD)
  • Filter class F7 acc. EN779:2012
  • ICON34 gasket_01_00_10
  • ICON2 eurovent energy efficiency class
  • ICON3 efficiency guarantee
  • ICON6
  • ICON7 iso16890.ai
  • ICON30 ozone 9
  • ICON1 commercial buildings
  • ICON37 ISO10121
  • ICON45 HAZE FREE
Item Type ISO/PM rating Filter Class EN779 Width (mm) Height (mm) Depth (mm) Airflow (m3/h) Pressure drop Initial (Pa) Energy Class (Eurovent)
CIZP-7I-0592/0592/0292-4V-25-BOP ePM1 70% F7 592 592 292 3400 130 E
CIZP-7I-0592/0490/0292-4V-25-BOP ePM1 70% F7 592 490 292 2800 130 E
CIZP-7I-0592/0287/0292-4V-25-BOP ePM1 70% F7 592 287 292 1500 130 E

Specifications

Application
Particle and odour removal in offices, hospitals, airports etc
Frame
Plastic moulded
Media
Synthetic/Activated Carbon
Max temperature °C
50ºC
Relative Humidity
70%
Gasket
One piece PU gasket (01 in the standard version)
Dimension standard
Filter front dimensions according EN 15805
Installation options
Front and side access housings and frames are available
Max Airflow
1,25 x nominal flow

Hospitals & Healthcare: St. James Hospital Dublin

Case Study: St James Hospital Prevents Aspergillus. Healthcare facilities must maintain the highest levels of cleanliness to promote health and healing. Camfil provides air cleaners for these environments. St. James Hospitaal in Dublin used Camfil for Aspergillus prevention.

Case Studies

Tata Power Trombay Retrofit

Case Study: Retrofit Solutions For Tata Power Ltd. Based on the site survey, Camfil proposed replacement of the pulse filter system with a three-stage static/barrier filter system, considering the local environment filled with refineries and a thermal power plant nearby.

Case Studies

UNIVERSITY SEES PROOF OF 24% LOWER ANNUAL ENERGY COSTS USING CAMFIL FILTER VS COMPETING FILTER

Case Study: Energy Savings At Western United States University. A Life Cycle Costing (LCC) analysis proved the Camfil Durafil filter operated at a 24% lower energy cost per year than the Viledon T-60. The Camfil product would save the customer $14 per filter per year versus the alternative.

Case Studies

In December 2019, Camfil Australia identified that an unknown third party had made unauthorised access to our email server. That access has been removed and security increased to prevent any future occurrences. It is possible that an email address on our server at that time, may be subject to spam. If you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email from Camfil Australia, please contact us directly. We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Find a contact